|
|

I Spy. .
.
Vol 2 Issue
1- Jan 2006
By Mark Robbins
"Spyware
is the latest emerging breed of technology threat endangering the security
of users and organizations," reported Derick Wong, Microsoft senior
product manager, Security/Management.
In a survey conducted by security firm WatchGuard, two-thirds of IT managers
named spyware as the number one threat to their networks' security. The
poll revealed that 66 percent of managers and administrators thought that
spyware would pose a greater threat this year than either viruses or phishing
attacks. Sixty-five percent also indicated that of the three threats, their
network were least protected from spyware. Most alarmingly, almost three
out of four IT managers said that more than half their users don't know
what spyware is.
Another study, conducted by America Online and the National Center for Supercomputing
Applications, found that 80 percent of computers were infected by some form
of spyware, and each infected computer had an average of 90 different spyware
packages installed.
Spyware is a threat that isn't going to go away easily, and both the public
and private sectors need to take action to combat the growing security risk.
In some cases, drastic steps have been taken for the sake of security. The
Australian government, for example, has gone as far as to introduce the
Spyware Bill 2005, new legislation that would punish with a sentence of
up to two years imprisonment anyone convicted of installing cookies or spyware
on computers without first receiving permission. Whether such drastic measures
are warranted is as yet unclear, but it is clear that business and industry
need to understand and address the dangers.
Embed vs. Spread
The danger posed by spyware is fundamentally different from computer viruses.
Unlike viruses whose main objective is to spread and infect as many computers
as possible, spyware more closely resemebles a parasite, embedding itself
in one computer and remaining undetected as it extracts user informaton.
Wong, explained, "Ranging from the mildly annoying to destructive,
computer viruses are deliberately designed to interfere with computer operation,
record, corrupt or delete data, or spread themselves to other computers
and throughout the Internet, often slowing things down and causing other
problems in the process. Spyware, on the other hand, is normally designed
to seek out information from an unsuspecting user and either use that information
or send it elsewhere."
Spyware is also a common cause of on-screen pop-ups and computer slowdowns.
Although these are sources of frustration and productivity declines, the
real threat lies in unauthorized data access. And while individual users
face the loss of personal information and the potential of identity theft,
the ramifications for companies are much greater. With our increasing dependence
on technology for data storage, everything from client and employee records
to product design specifications as well as research and development results
are potential targets of corporate espionage. The legal ramifications under
the new privacy legislation surrounding the unauthorized release or transfer
of personal information also comes into play.
"The theft of private information can be very damaging, especially
when that information is highly confidential. This is the primary concern
with spyware and is why organization's need to make it a priority to address
it."
Despite the threat, many larger organizations have been slow to respond
to the threat. According to a survey conducted by Trend MICRO/CNET Networks
(posted online by TechRepublic in March 2005), only 54% of large enterprises
have an anti-spyware solution deployed as compared to 80% of small enterprises.
Wong cited the following reasons for the slow response:
- Their security
policy forbids the use of "freeware" on their corporate
computers - many of the anti-spyware solutions are currently freeware;
- The organization's current security policies, procedures and technology
already minimizes the infiltration of spyware type programs
- Their
security policy only allows employees to access certain Internet sites
that are business specific and trusted - no personal or free web browsing.
Therefore the organization feels that they have minimized the spyware
risk
- There are currently very few anti-spyware packages that can
be centrally managed and monitored
- The organization may have
custom applications that conflict with the anti-spyware packages and
its scanners.
|
The good news is that with an ounce of prevention and a little knowledge,
you are less likely to fall victim to viruses and you can diminish their
impact.
Wong believes that employee education is the key to addressing the spyware
problem. "For the most part, spyware gets onto computer systems through
downloading malicious software unbeknownst to the user. This can often occur
in the workplace where the average employee is not a technology expert.
Spyware can also be downloaded from various Internet sites without the user
knowing it. This is even more dangerous than downloading software or files
from the Internet, as the user has only to browse or be misdirected to this
page and the download can happen automatically.
"Educating employees on an ongoing basis is part of the solution to
combating this problem. Ensuring that employees understand the harm caused
by installing software on their own is one step in the right direction.
IT administrators should be the only ones doing this, as this will help
prevent the installation of unwanted ‹ and sometimes harmful ‹ software
such as music or video file-sharing programs. Many times, employees do not
understand that doing so can jeopardize the security of an organization's
network.," he added.
"Spyware is just one of the many risks that organizations face today.
It is very important for organizations to have a robust corporate security
program along with a solid corporate security policy. This security program
must include not only technology to protect the organization, but educational
courses and policies that its employees must learn and practice. Security
is only as good as its weakest link and the failure of just one of the links
will result in unnecessary risk for an organization."
|
|
|